Microleakage of Flowable Composite Restorations

Author’s response I totally agree with comments by Pitak-Arnnop et al which emphasizes the importance of clinical relevance (though not statistically significant) and 95% CI confidence interval in today's publication process this change of mindset had evolved over many years of education on research & biostatistics. I must clarify that the present article is highlighting the well-known bias of significant P-value publication and hopefully to educate the researchers on this aspect look at the clinical relevance rather than statistical significance. Yes, today, researchers like Pitak-Arnnop et al understood this concept of this poor decision using the P-value and I thank him for adding the important information for the follow-up of this present article (which is constraint by length). Chan YH Singapore